Guide :

# 1004.497 nearest whole number

Find the nearest whole number of 1004.497

## Research, Knowledge and Information :

### What is 1004.8 to the nearest whole number - Answers.com

What is 1004.8 to the nearest whole number? ... so the nearest whole number is 2. ... The above does not say what happens to 0.497, for example.

It is 0.

### How to Round a Number - WebMath

How to Round a Number. Rounding a number is when you take a number and "bump it up" or "bump it down" to a nearby and "cleaner" number.

### CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT LICENSED EMPLOYEE SALARY ...

J 58,459 16,369 6,764 848 497 29 82,966 ... J 69,265 19,394 6,764 1,004 589 35 97,051 ... All figures rounding to the nearest whole number. Title:

### Decimal Rounding | Math For You

Whole Number Comparison; Whole Number Addition; ... Round 0.762 to the nearest tenth ... Tenth (10th) Round 0.821 to the nearest hundredth ... Hundredth (100th)

### FORM SECOND QUARTER - 2000 85 KANSAS SCHEDULE 1 - IFTA Fuel ...

PAGE 1 Round amounts in Columns B through F to nearest whole gallon and mile ... NAME AS SHOWN ON FORM 85 IFTA License Number Tax Period ETHANOL April 1, 2000 ...

### Monthly operating rept for Oct 1995 for Indian Point Unit 2 ...

12. Number. Of Hours Reactor ... 11, 497 27 967 12' 953 28. 967 ... Compute to the nearest whole megawatt. ,. . (9/77) UNIT SHUTDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS

### Rounding to the Nearest Thousandth Calculator | Calculator ...

Rounding to the Nearest Thousandth Calculator rounds given decimals and positive integer or negative integers to the nearest ... nearest whole number calculator:

## Suggested Questions And Answer :

### Round off 9704.8372 to the: nearest thousand,nearest whole number , two decimal places , three significant figures

Nearest thousand is 10000, which is nearer than 9000. 9704.8372 is 704.8372 away from 9000; but only 295.1628 away from 10000. The guide is usually the digit in the hundred position: if it's 5 or more then we go up to the next thousand (9 to 10 in this case), otherwise we just take the thousand digit as it is (9 in this case). 7, the hundred digit, is bigger than 5, so we take 10 thousand. Nearest whole number is 9705, which is nearer than 9704, because the next digit 8 is bigger than 5 and the 4 in the ones position goes up to 5. 2 dec places is 9704.84, which is nearer than 9704.83. 3 sig figures is 9700. The 3 figures are 9, 7 and 0, because the zero is occupying a place separating it from the next digit 4, so it is significant. The 4 would make it 4 sig figures. The size of the number has to be preserved because, for example, 970 would not suggest the right number of thousands. Leading zeroes in whole numbers or mixed numbers are always discounted because they do not have any effect on the magnitude of the number.

### estimate to the nearest whole number 3.68/8.44

"Solution: Given 3.68/8.44 =>368/844 => 0.4360" Whole Number Definition Whole number is collection of positive numbers and zero. Whole number also called as integer. The whole number is represented as {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ….}. The opposite of whole numbers are negative numbers. The representation of negative number is {-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9..}

### how do i convert this function: 2^n-1 so that it only returns whole number solutions.

Make it into the sum of a geometric progression where the first term (n=0) is 1 and a sub n+1=2a sub n. The sum to n terms is 2^n-1: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16. The sum of the first 5 terms is 31. The next sum would be 63=2^6-1. Sn=∑2^i for i=0 to n-1=2^n-1.

### what is three tenths rounded to the nearest whole number?

round(0.3)=0 ..........

### what is three tenths rounded to the nearest whole number?

round(0.3)=0 ............

### Interpolate the data set (1, 150), (3, 175), (4, 185), (6, 200), (8, 300) to estimate the amount of money Gracie may earn if she displays her items for 7 hours

Since 7 is halfway between 6 and 8, Gracie should earn an amount about halfway between 200 and 300, that is, 250 (triangular interpolation). This is the simplest interpolation, but see later. Interpolating for 2 and 5 we get 162.5 and 192.5, that is, respectively, a difference of 12.5 (162.5-150 or 175-162.5) and 7.5 (192.5-185 or 200-192.5), while 250 is a difference of 50 from 200 and 300. So the interpolated figures fluctuate. For a more sophisticated approach, we need to take the whole dataset and look for a formula that best fits. One way to do this is to fit a polynomial F(x)=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e into the five given points. This polynomial has 5 unknown coefficients, so with 5 simultaneous equations we should be able to find them. The process can be simplified slightly by taking the lowest "x" coord and using that as the zero starting point. In this case the lowest coord is 1 (hour) so we subtract 1 from the first coord of each pair to get: (0,150), (2,175), etc. F(0)=e=150. So we have the constant 150. The next step is to subtract 150 from each of the other "y" coords so we arrive at the following set of equations: (1) F(2)=16a+8b+4c+2d=25 (2) F(3)=81a+27b+9c+3d=35 (3) F(5)=625a+125b+25c+5d=50 (4) F(7)=2401a+343b+49c+7d=150 and we already have F(0)=150=e. We can now eliminate d from (1) and (2): 2F(3)-3F(2): (162-48)a+(54-24)b+(18-12)c=70-75=-5; (5) 114a+30b+6c=-5. and we can eliminate d from (3) and (4): 5F(7)-7F(5): (12005-4375)a+(1715-875)b+(245-175)c=750-350; 7630a+840b+70c=400 which simplifies to (6) 763a+84b+7c=40 or 109a+12b+c=40/7 We can eliminate c between (5) and (6): 6(6)-(5): (654-114)a+(72-30)b=240/7+5=275/7; (7) 540a+42b=275/7 or 90a+7b=275/42. So b=(275/42-90a)/7. From (6) we have: 109a+12b+c=109a+12(275/42-90a)/7+c=40/7, so c=40/7-109a-12(275/42-90a)/7; c=40/7-550/7+(1080/7-109)a=-510/7+317a/7=(317a-510)/7. We now have b and c in terms of a. We can continue to find d in terms of a. From (1) d=(25-16a-8b-4c)/2=25-16a-8(275/42-90a)/7-4(317a-510)/7; d=25-1100/147+2040/7+(-16+720/7-1268/7)a= (3675-1100+42840)/147+(-112+720-1268)a/7; d=45415/147-660a/7. We have b, c and d in terms of a, so we can find a by substituting into an equation containing all four coefficients (but not (1), because we used it to find d). Let's pick (2) and hope we get a sensible result! 81a+27(275/42-90a)/7+9(317a-510)/7+3(45415/147-660a/7)=35. From this a=5143/2772=1.855. Therefore b=-22.919, c=78.510, d=-67.687, e=150. And F(x)=1.855x^4-22.919x^3+78.510x^2-67.687x+150. This results need to be checked before we use F to find an interpolated value. Unfortunately, this polynomial approach produces inconsistent results, and needs to be discarded. Lagrange's method seems the obvious choice, even if it is tedious to do. We have 5 x values which we'll symbolise as x0, x1, x2, x3, x4 and 5 function values f0, f1, f2, f3, f4. If the function we're looking for is f(x) then: f(x)=(x-x1)(x-x2)(x-x3)(x-x4)f0/((x0-x1)(x0-x2)(x0-x3)(x0-x4))+         (x-x0)(x-x2)(x-x3)(x-x4)f1/((x1-x0)(x1-x2)(x1-x3)(x1-x4))+         (x-x0)(x-x1)(x-x3)(x-x4)f2/((x2-x0)(x2-x1)(x2-x3)(x2-x4))+... x0=1, x1=3, x2=4, x3=6, x4=8; f0=150, f1=175, f2=185, f3=200, f4=300. We want x=7, so f(7) is given by: 4.3.1.-1.150/(-2.-3.-5.-7)+6.3.1.-1.175/(2.-1.-3.-5)+ 6.4.1.-1.185/(3.1.-2.-4)+6.4.3.-1.200/(5.3.2.-2)+ 6.4.3.1.300/(7.5.4.2) This comes to: -60/7+105-185+240+540/7=1600/7=228.57 (229 to the nearest whole number) compared with 250 from the simple interpolation.

### How many different distributions can the manager make if every employee receives at least one voucher?

There must be 100 vouchers because each is worth RM5 and the total value is 500 ringgits or RM500. (i) Each employee receives at least 1 voucher, so that means there are 95 vouchers left to distribute. We can write each distribution as {A,B,C,D,E}: starting with {0,0,0,0,95}, then {0,0,0,1,94}, {0,0,0,2,93}, ..., {0,0,0,95,0}, {0,0,1,0,94}, ..., {0,0,95,0,0}, ..., ..., {95,0,0,0,0}. So when A=B=C=0, {D,E} range from {0,95}, {1,94}, ..., to {95,0}, 96 ways. When A=B=0 and C=1, {D,E} range from {0,94} to {94,0}, 95 ways. Finally when C=95 so {C,D,E}={95,0,0} we will have covered 96+95+...+1=96*97/2=4656 ways. (The sum of the whole numbers from 1 to n is given by S=n(n+1)/2.) That was for B=0; when B=1, {C,D,E} ranges from {0,0,94} to {94,0,0} to cover 95*96/2=4560 ways. When B=2 it's 94*95/2=4465 ways. So for A=0 we have 4656+4560+4465+...+3+1 = 96^2+94^2+...+2^2 = 4(48^2+47^2+46^2+...+2^2+1^2)=4*48*49*97/6=152096 (the sum of the squares of the whole numbers from 1 to n is given by S=n(n+1)(2n+1)/6. Also, the sum of whole numbers between 1 and n taken in pairs gives us: n(n+1)/2+(n-1)n/2 for each pair. This is n^2/2+n/2+n^2/2-n/2=n^2. For the next pair we get (n-2)^2 and so on.) That was just for A=0! For A=1 we have {1,0,0,0,94} to {1,94,0,0,0}. This will give us 4560+4465+...+10+6+3+1 = 95^2+93^2+...+5^2+3^2+1. There is a formula for this sum. It is S=(n+1)(2n+1)(2n+3)/3, where 2n+1=95, so n=47. So for A=1, the number of ways is 48*95*97/3=147440. For A=2 we have {2,0,0,0,93} to {2,93,0,0,0} which produces 94^2+92^2+...+4^2+2^2 = 4(47^2+46^2+...+1) = 4*47*48*95/6 = 142880. So we alternate between two formulae as A continues to go from 3 to 95.  More to follow...

### what is 300170.7631 rounded to the nearest integer?

300170.7631 rounded to the nearest integer the 7 to the right of the decimal place is greater than or equal to 5, so the 0 in the ones place rounds up to 1 Answer:  300171

### round 1 1/9 to the nearest wholw number

1 1/9 is 10/9, because we multiply the whole number 1 by the denominator (bottom) of the fraction and add the result to the numerator (top) of the fraction part making it 10, making the improper fraction 10 over 9. That's a division, 10 divided by 9. 9 goes into 10 once (the whole number 1) remainder 1, which is 1/9 or one ninth. The nearest whole number is therefore 1. Rounding to the nearest whole number just means: is 1 1/9 nearer to 1 or 2? If the remainder when 9 was divided into 10 had been more than half of 9, we would have rounded to whole number 2. How many ninths would cause us to round to 2? The number 4 is less than half of 9, so we would still be nearer to 1 than 2; but if we had 5 or more (5, 6, 7 or 8) we would round to 2.